Tuesday, August 24, 2010

What are some famous Protected Speech cases in the US?

I am currently looking for a way to get around the 1st amendment of the US constituion in a debate. I ahve to argue the affirmative of Texas v. Johnson and every case relating to this has been shot down by the supreme court. Is there any real example of the 1st amendment being overturned besides when it is used to promote drugs?What are some famous Protected Speech cases in the US?
Quick!! Copy this before they make it disappear!!





History hides the lies and hopefully you can uncover the truth in time to stop the pattern before it is too late. Lets start with the grandfather to our current President, George Jr.; Prescott Bush went down for Trading With The Enemies Act for selling pig iron to the Nazi War Machine! The Bush family’s wealth comes from their corporations in Germany using the Jews in the concentration camps as free labor! After the War, the Nazis were helped out of Germany by calling them “Scientists” and they were brought to The United States of America and other countries! Ever heard of the “Compound” in Argentina? Adolph “Hitler” and other Nazis have died there of old age after the War was over.





Fritz Springmeyer, a genealogist, wrote a book in 1995 titled; Bloodlines of the Illuminati. In his book you will find out that Abraham “Lincoln”, Adolph “Hitler”, and William Jefferson “Clinton” have three things in common. First, they all led their countries! Second, they are all adopted! Third, they were all adopted out of the same Sir Name family; Rothchild (“Red Shield”), which is the Bauer family; and where are they from? Germany! The international banker family that just happens to be the life long financier for the Vatican!


Watch PBS’s Inquistion series if you have any questions. I believe that Abraham Rothschild’s real identity was discovered and he was assassinated for it! This country swore that it would never let the international banker families lead our nation! Whoops!





The “Esquires” from the “British” Accreditation Regency (BAR)


run The United States. In the 1700’s, Massachusetts called them Vermin and the Masters of Chaos because the laws that they wrote could be argued against themselves before the ink dried! The rationale is that there must be a controversy before there can be a “court” case and a Vermin can make money! Chaos producing and self serving SOB's, aren’t they? How are they doing? Look around, how are things running? Chaotic? Perfect!





Check the BAR Association’s Code of Ethical Responsibilities ( its free, just call the BAR), where it states that there are no “courts”! The word court appears in the document only once; it is the last word, in the last line, on the last page! That sentence reads; Tribunals refers to “courts.” Courts is in quotes!!! Things with quotes don’t exist, do they? I personally verified these facts at the US Attorney’s Office; there are no Courts, they are tribunals, Tribunals are Military, the Military belongs to the Commander in Chief. The Unitary Executive is already in full swing and has been since the US Bankruptcy of 1933 at the hands of the British. You know it as the “New Deal”, apparently you didn’t like the old deal! We are still in that Bankruptcy proceeding today and this is why the word POLICY is now used instead of the word LAW! The Executive is making the Law with Executive Orders!





These “British Agents” are 100% of the US Judicial Branch, if it really was there! British Loyalists are also the majority in the Legislative Branch and the Executive Branch. Those that aren’t BAR members; that is, they have NOT taken an Oath to the British and became an Esquire, one step above Gentleman amd one below Knight on the “British” lineup. They all have at least one BAR member attached to them. Including our current President, who had six private “attorneys” when he entered the Office of President! Hey, wait a minute, the office of the President comes with the Attorney General’s office full of attorneys. Why would he need six private “attorneys”? Is he in a law suit? No, a sitting President cannot be sued! Then, what are they for? They are his “British” handlers! When George Bush, Jr. was “made” President by the Supreme Tribunal, that Tribunal belonged to the sitting President; William Jefferson Rothschild/Bauer/Clinton!


The Nazi, George Jr. Bush was going to be President, one way or another; look at the facts again and again and again, until you see it! The Unitary Executive is already in place, two of the three branches are in the Executive, the Executive’s signing statements and the “Handlers” attached to every non-BAR person in the Legislative Branch!





According to the LAW, “Attorneys” can only RE-present three groups of persons; 1) infants, 2) wards of the “court” and 3) person’s of unsound mind! Which one are you when you retain an attorney? When you retain an “attorney”, you make an Affirmation and Declaration to the “court” of Non Compus Mentis (Latin); its translation is: NOT MENTALLY COMPETANT!! Crazy by your/their own volition and consent! Totally Voluntary, Sheep!








Prescott Bush was a Nazi lover and nuts never fall far from the Tree! George Bush, Sr. is a Nazi; William Rothschild is an international banker; George Bush, Jr. is a Nazi; and now here comes Hitlery, I married into the Rothschild banker family and my offspring (Chelsea) has Bauer blood; and I will be the Queen in America! She is B A R and so are most of the other “candidates” that you have to choose from to be your next President! When General Betrayus was in front of Congress, he said; “not to be flippant, I will need to consult my “attorney”! Say what? A General that isn’t mentally competent by his own Affirmation and Declaration, is serving in our Military? That’s what he said. Someone in Congress should have asked to speak with his master, the Master of the Puppet, Esquire!





Have you ever wondered why John Kerry didn’t speak up four separate times while campaigning against George, Jr. when he should have wiped the floor with him? John is related to George and they are both cousins to the Queen in England! John married the Heinz money just before running, coincidence? I think not! And William Jefferson Rothschild’s number two, Al Gore isn’t going to save you either! Al remained quiet while the Election was stolen from him and he held his tongue! Just like William told him to! Ever wonder why the BAR Association didn’t say anything while it was happening or even after the fact? The insane are leading the crazy into WWIII, all on behalf of the Vatican and it’s financiers! George W. Bush gave a State of the Union speech after returning from the Vatican and in that speech he used the word, Crusade; the Christian Holy War! Jihad anyone?





If you would like to see what they have prepared for you, you will need to examine all Acts and all the Executive Orders fron the beginning to today! If you do, you will see exactly who is running this country, how they came to power, how they are running this country and what they are planning to do with it next. It paints a picture and it isn’t a very pretty picture for US! They are following Commander Albert Pike’s THREE World Wars Blue Print, it was located in a Museum in London and now copies are floating around America.


Albert Pike wrote the plan for the three World Wars somewhere between 1859 and 1879; Pike names the combatants for WWI and who wins! He states; “ that which was created out of WWI, sets up WWII.” He then wrote down the combatants for WWII, Germany vs. Europe. He then writes Germany loses and Israel becomes a State in Palestine! In 1948 Rothschild creates modern day Israel with Judaism Jews out of Khazaria (once located in Russia) and in downtown Tel Aviv you will find two banks, one at 39th and 50th Rothschild Blvd.


Rothschild literally means Red Shield, it is two triangles in Red, one pointed up and the other overlapping the first, pointing down. Some mistakenly call it the Star of David, if it is in Blue, it is Modern day Israel’s flag! Commander Pike then wrote; “that which was created out of WWII, sets up WWIII.” The Jewish Nationalists vs. the Muslims, both sides to there total demise and the Vatican moves it’s Throne to Jerusalem! This is why the Muslims built a Temple on the Mount in Jerusalem! They already know that it is coming. Notice that Pike said Jewish Nationalists and not Israelis or Israelites, they plan on drawing in all the Jews of the World for the final WAR, including the Christians! They all have to go according to Commander Pike’s Three World Wars Plan!





There are two Israel(s); if you are from Israel in the Bible, you are an Israelite! If you are from Israel today, you are an Israeli! What is the difference? An Israelite is bloodline Jew and an Israeli is a Jew by religion only; Judaism! The country of Khazaria was located in old Russia and the King turned the whole country to Judaism, these are the Israelis of today; Khazars, just like Henry Kissinger and company! Rothschild created this “recreation of what looks like the Bible references” but they are not the bloodline Jews, the Israelites of the Bible; the bloodline of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Shem. When they say that you are being anti Semitic, they aren’t pronouncing it correctly! It is Shemitic, the decendents of Shem! The Shemites! There are at lease three types of Jews that I can find, Bloodline Jews, Judaism Jews, and CONfused Jews- the Christians! Christians claim that they follow Jesus Christ, the King of the Jews, who led Israelites and said; “take this even unto the Gentiles!” There are Jews and Gentiles; What was talking? Who CONfused the Jews? The Bible says that you will all be deceived by your leaders and it is right! Who is your leader, CONfused Jew? The VATICAN AND HIS BANKER!!! A man on Earth will claim himself OUR FATHER WHO ART IN HEAVEN, HALLOWED BE THY NAME and make up the word “GOD” for the Inculcation of worshipers of the Greek mountain deity named GOTT. This man will change our Father’s LAWS and he will bear the sign of the BEAST, the number of man, 666. I would now like to apply all three to the Vatican, two popes in official writings, appropriately named Papal BULL, claimed themselves “God” on Earth! The Vatican then split the 10th Commandment into the 9th and the 10th, and took out; “Thou shall not make unto thyself ANY engraven images, nor shall thy bow down to ANY engraven image! Could you please explain that Cruixifix to me, CONfused Jew! The other Commandment that was changed, now says, keep holy the Sabbath; which originally stated, “for six days I did labor and on the seventh day I did rest and that day is the Sabbath and is to be set apart.” The Jews did have names for the days; Constantine, the Roman Emperor named the days! He declared that on the first day of the week you will worship the Sun (Sun-day), on the second day you will worship the Moon (Moon-day), the third day you will worship Tao (Tao’s-day), the forth day you will will worship Woden (Woden’s-day), the fifth day you will worship Thor (Thor’s-day), on the sixth day you will worship Nimrod’s wife Frye (Frye-day), and on the SEVENTH DAY YOU WILL WORSHIP THE GREEK “GOD” SATURN (Saturn-day). Check your calendar, Sunday is NOT the Seventh day!!! All we are missing is the number of man. The pope “bears” a had called the Matre. On the Matre in Roman letters, it’s translation is “Vicar son of God”. Another claiming to be OUR FATHER! Take the Roman letters off the Matre and take out the Roman Numeral system, write the value next to each letter, for those that don’t have a value, put a zero! Add it up sucker! 1-2-3 Guess who you be!





I would like to close with my reasons for 9-11, George Bush, Sr.!


As George Bush, Sr. was leaving the office of President, he did some remarkable things; he pardoned the bagman for the Iran-contra scandal, Adnag Kashogi. Then he helped a Canadian company called Barrett Gold Minning of Canada, take possession of a gold mine located in Nevada, for $10,000 to the US Government. George, Sr. then leaves the office of President and becomes a Director on two boards; the Carlisle Group and Barrett Gold Mining of Canada and found that the majority stock holder was that renowned Canadian; Adnag Kashogi, the bagman from the Iran-contra scandal. What should really burn your britches is that Congress of the United States had to approve the sale of that Gold Mine, they gave the Gold Mine to George Bush, Sr. and Adnag Kashogi for $10,000! That mine had 20 billion in gold ore with the price of gold around $170 an ounce when they took it, now the price of gold is $700+ per ounce and rising quickly so that 20 billion is now worth four/five/six times as much. To get everyone that noticed what had just happened and to keep them off of daddy Bush, they staged 9-11 and immediately invaded Iraq to cover up 9-11. All to push forward Albert Pike’s plan and cover up for George Bush, Sr.!


Are you ready for the next phase of the plan? Do they really care if you are? NO, you aren’t supposed to know what the plan is and that way they can use it to extract your wealth while they kill off your offspring on one side of the War or the other! Pick a side; Homicide, Suicide, or Genocide! They will CONvince you that it really was your choice, they are the Master of Chaos; VERMIN! The US has a Vermin problem! Calling all exterminators!





From the desk of thy,


Les Fortune


A Patriot





P.S.


You have been captured Colonists, every Presidential or any other “candidate” for governmental positions should be asked these questions:





1) Have you ever taken an Oath to another country? (like the British?)


2) Have you ever surrendered your Citizenship for any reason?


3) Have you ever made an Affirmation and/or Declaration of not being mentally competent? Are you Crazy? (A quote from the musical group, Pink Floyd; “All the world knows that he is Crazy, Truly Gone Fishing!” Do you have Bats in the Belfry, are you a few bricks shy of a full load, of are you playing cards +with only part of the deck?





The Legislative Branch makes the Law and the Executive Branch is charged with the enforcement of the Law, therefore every person in the Executive Branch of all levels of government are Law Enforcement Officials. Yes they are, and from the Law books known as American Jurisprudence: 70 Am Jur 2d Subsection 90; “Any Law Enforcement Official who misconstrues or misapplies the Law to my harm, is 100% Liable in their Private Capacity.” That is your house, your car, your boat, your bank accounts, …. you Play with me, you Pay with Me!!


Be Well Patriots and eat a Loyalist for lunch.





Also Read -


Biggest Secret -- The Book That Will Change The World --


By David Icke -- Chapter 17


It will tell you about France and our Statue of Liberty.What are some famous Protected Speech cases in the US?
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution is a part of the United States Bill of Rights. It prohibits the federal legislature from making laws ';respecting an establishment of religion'; (the ';Establishment Clause';) or that prohibit free exercise of religion (the ';Free Exercise Clause';), laws that infringe the freedom of speech, infringe the freedom of the press, limit the right to assemble peaceably, or limit the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.


Although the First Amendment explicitly prohibits only the named rights from being abridged by laws made by Congress, the courts have interpreted it as applying more broadly. As the first sentence in the body of the Constitution reserves all law-making (';legislative';) authority to Congress, the courts have held that the First Amendment's terms also extend to the executive and judicial branches. Additionally, in the 20th century the Supreme Court has held that the Due Process clause of the 1868 Fourteenth Amendment ';incorporates'; the limitations of the First Amendment to restrict also the states.





John and Mary Beth Tinker attended public school in Des Moines, Iowa. In December of 1965 a community group in Des Moines decided to protest American involvement in the Vietnam War by wearing black armbands. The Tinkers agreed to wear their black armbands to school. However, principals in the school district, aware of the students' plans created a rule that any student wearing an armband to school would be suspended unless the student removed the armband. Although the Tinkers knew about this rule, they decided to come to school wearing armbands anyway. After refusing to take the armbands off, John and Mary Beth Tinker were sent home by the principal. Their suspension lasted until they agreed to come back to school without the armbands.


The Tinkers filed a suit in the U.S. District Court to stop the school principals from enforcing the rule in the future. Although the District Court said that this type of protest was a form of expression protected under the First Amendment's freedom of speech clause, the Court sided with the school officials, saying that the rule was needed to ';prevent the disturbance of school activities.'; The Tinkers appealed their case to the U.S. Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, but they lost. The Tinkers decided to appeal the case to the Supreme Court of the United States.


The fundamental question of the case came down to this: Does the First Amendment's promise of free speech extend to the symbolic speech of public school students? And, if so, in what circumstances is that symbolic speech protected? The First Amendment to the Constitution says, ';Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech.'; The Fourteenth Amendment extends this rule to state government as well, of which schools are a part. However, the First Amendment does not say which kinds of speech are protected. It also does not specify what types of expressive actions should be considered as speech.


The question of what kind of speech or action is protected under the First Amendment has been considered many times by the Supreme Court of the United States. Generally, the Court has held that the First Amendment protects adult symbolic speech that does not harm or threaten to harm. However, at the time of Tinker, it was unclear whether students' rights in this area were different.


In 1968 the Supreme Court of the United States agreed to hear the Tinker's case and consider whether the Des Moines public schools ban on armbands was an unconstitutional violation of the students' right to free speech. The Court's decision in Tinker v. Des Moines was handed down in 1969.





http://www.landmarkcases.org/tinker/back…





During the 1984 Republican National Convention in Dallas, Texas, respondent Johnson participated in a political demonstration to protest the policies of the Reagan administration and some Dallas-based corporations. After a march through the city streets, Johnson burned an American flag while protesters chanted. No one was physically injured or threatened with injury, although several witnesses were seriously offended by the flag burning. Johnson was convicted of desecration of a venerated object in violation of a Texas statute, and a State Court of Appeals affirmed. However, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals reversed, holding that the State, consistent with the First Amendment, could not punish Johnson for burning the flag in these circumstances. The court first found that Johnson's burning of the flag was expressive conduct protected by the First Amendment. The court concluded that the State could not criminally sanction flag desecration in order to preserve the flag as a symbol of national unity. It also held that the statute did not meet the State's goal of preventing breaches of the peace, since it was not drawn narrowly enough to encompass only those flag burnings that would likely result in a serious disturbance, and since the flag burning in this case did not threaten such a reaction. Further, it stressed that another Texas statute prohibited breaches of the peace and could be used to prevent disturbances without punishing this flag desecration.





http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/ge…





Affirmative Action and Online Free Speech Cases Once Again Loom Large on Supreme Court Docket (10/3/2002)


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE


Thursday, October 3, 2002


WASHINGTON--This year, the Supreme Court has once again been asked to consider the high profile issues of affirmative action and free speech online in two important cases on the ACLU docket.


The first case involves two challenges to the use of race as one factor in determining admissions at the University of Michigan. The second is a challenge to a law that forces libraries to deny adults as well as minors access to constitutionally protected speech online in order to receive federal funding.





http://www.aclu.org/scotus/2002/21931prs…





The Supreme Court heard a case about free speech Monday after a Juneau, Alaska high school student was suspended for displaying a sign, ';Bong Hits 4 Jesus'; at an off-campus school activity. National Law Journal's Marcia Coyle discusses the case.





In January of 2002, while standing along a parade route just across from his Juneau, Alaska, high school, then 18-year-old Joe Frederick unfurled a 14-foot-long banner which read, ';Bong Hits 4 Jesus.';


Frederick freely admitted he was challenging school authority. School principal Deborah Morse quickly confiscated the banner and suspended Frederick for 10 days. Frederick sued Principal Morse and the school board for violating his First Amendment rights to free speech.


He lost at the federal district level, but won in appeals court. Morse then appealed all the way to the Supreme Court, which today heard oral arguments in the case.





http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/law/jan-j…
  • face make up remover
  • No comments:

    Post a Comment